multimedia @ VU
[] readme register schedule participants assignment(s) resource(s) _ / .

talk show tell print

status

In case you wish (more explicit) feedback contact your supervisor.

10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: nice, although a bit dominated by blogspot style, elements a bit hidden, eg. logo in februari.
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: nice, with political interpretation
    • sign: with creative guidelines, colorful
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: interesting, but make availbe as .pdf or phote sequence (not .doc!)
    • collage: samples ok, but make the total collage available
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks: nice work, but it needs some finalization


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: ok, clear, basic but effective style
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: should be about CTSG, but otherwise well done, personal is promising but needs some work
    • sign: nice idea (althouh as a smoker I disagree), good experimentation
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: about a cat, poetic
    • collage: intriguing abstraction/distortion + visual quotes, combined into interesting statement
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: good overall style, though you may (for the moment suppress technical details)
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: personal one (band) stronger than CTSG
    • sign: highly appropriate, and clear
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: ambitious but well done
    • collage: good statement, and appropriate style
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: I would prefer a portfolio which also gives an over, not only a sequence of the work. And click may be replace by next, which then should be complemented by prev!
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: strong, I like it
    • sign: nice thought, although ..., the visuals of it could probaby be improved, I think
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: well done, although it seems unfinished, one way or another
    • collage: an explanation would be helpful, in terms of elements: a bit much
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: clear, good style, but I could do without the announcement on Home, an overview or personal statment would be welcome (and less schoolish)
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: nice effectivem although a bit too figurative, to my mind
    • sign: good idea, but on the one hand the topic could be represented more indirectly (slow sign), and I think the car is visually unsatisfactory
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: good atmosphere, but some supporting text, and possibly explanation would be helpful
    • collage: very nice, the strongest of the portfolio, I think
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: nice personal style, clear
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: too symmetrical, IMHO, but good underlying thought(s0
    • sign: in retrospect, it almost looks as if the dog brings a newspaper, which would imply be nice to nice dogs, for the rest good visual style
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: (my preference), nice material and (graph) presentation, with relevant story
    • collage:
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: on first impression, strong
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: last one strong idea, but composition could be enhanced, I find the letters to isolated
    • sign: totally agree
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: excellent idea, ambitious, but realization satisfactory
    • collage: excellent topic, and quote -- without music life would be a mistake, visually you could go a step further
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: clean, basic style, but omit welcome statement. Additional explanation(s)/justification(s) would, however, be welcome!
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: made of bricks, OK, but perhaps not expressive wrt meaning
    • sign: blockhead TV, good idea, although difficult to transmit
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: having just been in egmond: appropriate. good topic
    • collage: topic clear, could find better articulation though
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: very impressive at first sight, but I think it needs additional justifications, and show the process (too)
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: basic, good
    • sign: as a motorcyclist I find this totally justified, but the imperative behind it should also be clear to non-motorcyclists. Is it?
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: nice, evaocative, but could well be extended, with a little bit more explicit story
    • collage: not online (yet)
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: excellent consistent setup, with good overall vieuw
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: very good idea, the pixelation could be continued in letter, that is CTSG might have more distortion
    • sign: good thought, although a permissive sign (eg. blue bycicle sign) might be more effective than a prohibitive *red* sign.
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: very well done, I like the progressionof development(s)
    • collage: also very clear, well-articulated, although some of the elements are slightly too dominant, I think
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: in construction (now folder)
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: nice, promising
    • sign: also, not bad
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence:
    • collage:
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks: 13/3/10: complete the portfolio, asap!


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: well done, a bit flashy, but nice, however some explanation/justification(s) would improve the work
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: very good, I like the style and color scheme
    • sign: well-motivated, and nicely done (these with good explanation!)
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: intriguing atmosphere!
    • collage: evocative, but seems to be still open for an articulation of statement
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: very good first impression, with nice personal logo (that I originally mistook for the CTSG logo). Showing the process, or simulating a process, would improve the portfolio.
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: very good, also the CTSG logo
    • sign: interesting thought/equation, visually conventional though
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: excellent, intriguing
    • collage: does not load
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: very well done, a good first impression, and navigation is clear. (the zip under portfolio is confusing, though)
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: I prefer the first one, which is graphically more clear, and also since the pun is quite appropriate!
    • sign: nice, and instead of the green you might consider blue, which somehow suggests more of an imperative.
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: adequate, and well-done
    • collage: (missed that at first, mistook it for a sign), nice thought, still have some doubts, but no clear advice at this stage ...
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: good, clear structure, nice background, clear comments
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: i like them both, and incidentally the dots remind me of pills, which afterall are another source of superpower
    • sign: nice idea, although the nothing could be more inviting, apart from the color and lack of bar
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: nice viaual joke with house, although (likely) knowledge about its intention is necessary to appreciate that
    • collage: relevant thought(s), heavy with meaning, but perhaps too direct
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: contains good work, but (finish construction and) add structure and explanations
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: nice, a bit dependent on (game) context
    • sign: well done, visually clear and well-motivated
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: good, although rather safe story
    • collage: nice way to collect this variety of material, well-done
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: aquarium of the mind, nice and well structured
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo:
    • sign: nice subtle solution, a bit cheeky also
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: well done, I like it, the story I mean, not necessarily the pasta
    • collage: not bad, good atmosphere and nice message, slightly to symmetrical around the horizontal axis though, in my opinion
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: lloks very good, although you may supress the capital in portfolio. All in all,well structured, and interesting
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: good start, however more as element in a game than as brand
    • sign: well, I can only agree, well executed
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: good underlying motivation, but I think the coherence of the images could be better, supporting the same idea of shift in perspective
    • collage: excellent, a wealth of ideas, well-motivated, reads like a game, so to speak
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks: 18/3/10: good work, I am glad you took the course.


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: promising, well-organised, good taste, but you might take (perhaps) a somewhat more risky approach
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: adequate, nice visual sketchy) style
    • sign: good, although for both red and green visual elements could be more integrated
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: the room is clean, appropriate subject, well-done
    • collage: good way to collect visual information, all in all a good approach
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


10/design -- visual design

  1. overall portfolio: well-done, promising, but still a bit conventional in structure
  2. basic exercises:
    • logo: ladder, in perspective would very likely be stronger, nice and simple though
    • sign: a good example of a slow sign, however, try it against a proper background, possibly different color schemes (sometimes: less is more)
    • (storyboard)/bw phote sequence: the way to work, but think about the arrow
    • collage: topic clear, and structure OK, I like the broken background, but somehow the elements could be better integrated
  3. final application:
  4. presentation(s)/essay(s):
  5. observation(s):

remarks:


[] readme register schedule participants assignment(s) resource(s) _ / .